Hi Huang,
thanks for the patch.
-----Original Message-----
For DISKDUMP case, we can get VA_BITS_ACTUAL from
CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS.
I could not understand this, there is a case where CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS
is different from VA_BITS_ACTUAL and why is this only for DISKDUMP case?
If the patch intends to guess the value of VA_BITS_ACTUAL to be the same as
CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS when no NUMBER(TCR_EL1_T1SZ), I think that DISKDUMP
check is not needed and it would be better to write such a commit log and
a comment e.g. "/* guess */" on the else if block.
Thanks,
Kazu
Without this patch, we may have to use "--machdep
vabits_actual=48" to
set the VA_BITS_ACTUAL.
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie(a)os.amperecomputing.com>
---
arm64.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
index 4f2c2b5..2b3ec02 100644
--- a/arm64.c
+++ b/arm64.c
@@ -4170,6 +4170,12 @@ arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void)
} else if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL) {
machdep->machspec->VA_BITS = machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL;
machdep->machspec->VA_START =
_VA_START(machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
+ } else if (pc->flags & DISKDUMP) {
+ if (machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS) {
+ machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL =
machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS;
+ machdep->machspec->VA_BITS =
machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS;
+ machdep->machspec->VA_START =
_VA_START(machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
+ }
} else
error(FATAL, "cannot determine VA_BITS_ACTUAL\n");
}
--
2.30.2
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility(a)redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility