On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:44:10AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> For x86, crash avoids storing any '__crc_*' symbols. It should do
the
> >> same for ARM, right? Credit goes to Rabin Vincent for this patch,
> >> unless you don't like it, in which case you can blame me.
> >
> > I suppose. It was more of a clutter-reducer than anything else in
> > the case of x86. But I do note that the __crc_ symbols come after
> > "_end" in one of the sample ARM dumpfiles I've got on hand.
> >
>
> Clutter reduction is the reason for both of these patches as well and
> even if the __crc_'s are ignored we'll still get _end+<offset>
> printouts for everything in the range [_end, 0xff0a81a8]. Of course, a
> patch for PRRR shouldn't break 'mod -s'. Here's an alternative
patch.
>
> /Per
OK good -- I'll queue both the __crc_ and PRRR/NMRR patches for crash-6.1.3,
pending any (unlikely) disapprovals/NAKs from Mika or Jan.
Sorry for being late. Both patches look good to me.