Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> writes:
That's kind of cluttered -- I was thinking of something like
this:
crash> kmem ffffea0004de2c00
CACHE NAME OBJSIZE ALLOCATED TOTAL SLABS SSIZE
ffff88013a719900 ext4_inode_cache 2200 730 742 53 32k
SLAB MEMORY NODE TOTAL ALLOCATED FREE RED_ZONE
ffffea0004de2c00 ffff8801378b0000 0 14 2 12 8
FREE / [ALLOCATED]
ffff8801378b0000 (cpu 0 cache)
[ffff8801378b08b8]
or better yet, this:
crash> kmem ffffea0004de2c00
CACHE NAME OBJSIZE ALLOCATED TOTAL SLABS SSIZE
ffff88013a719900 ext4_inode_cache 2200 730 742 53 32k
SLAB MEMORY NODE TOTAL ALLOCATED FREE
ffffea0004de2c00 ffff8801378b0000 0 14 2 12
FREE / [ALLOCATED] SLAB_RED_ZONE: 8
ffff8801378b0000 (cpu 0 cache)
[ffff8801378b08b8]
I see what you say. However, my usual usage of kmem is to get the data
address of object (I was thinking the most users are same usage).
crash> kmem <pointer in stack>
info for data address
copy & paste <data address>
crash> p *(struct inode *)<data address>
So I want to display <data address> itself (btw, cluttered is same with
"cpu %d cache"). BTW, ->red_left_pad itself can get from CACHE's
address, so if displaying <data address> is unacceptable, I would not
have big interest to add ->red_left_pad itself.
If this usage is only me, unfortunate though, I will apply this patch by
myself.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi(a)mail.parknet.co.jp>