----- Original Message -----
 
 OK, I understand.  Let me work on a new "set redzone on/off" environment
 variable that can be toggled on-and-off during runtime.
 
 But I believe I see a problem in do_slab_slub().  When it is checking for free
 objects to display as FREE / [ALLOCATED], it will never find it in 4.6+ kernels
 with a red_left_pad.  Note below, when it checks whether (p == q), the "q"
address
 is the "shifted" address seen by the kmalloc() caller, and will never match
the
 base object address "p", so "is_free" never gets set:
 
         for (p = vaddr; p < vaddr + objects * si->size; p += si->size) {
                 hq_open();
                 is_free = FALSE;
                 /* Search an object on both of freelist and cpu_freelist */
                 ulong lists[] = { freelist, cpu_freelist, };
                 for (i = 0; i < sizeof(lists) / sizeof(lists[0]); i++) {
                         for (is_free = 0, q = lists[i]; q;
                              q = get_freepointer(si, (void *)q)) {
 
                                 if (q == BADADDR) {
                                         hq_close();
                                         return FALSE;
                                 }
                                 if (q & PAGE_MAPPING_ANON)
                                         break;
 === never can match ===>        if (p == q) {
                                         is_free = TRUE;
                                         goto found_object;
                                 }
                                 if (!hq_enter(q)) {
                                         hq_close();
                                         error(INFO, "%s: slab: %lx duplicate
                                         freelist object: %lx\n",
                                               si->curname, si->slab, q);
                                         return FALSE;
                                 }
                         }
                 }
         found_object:
 ...
 
 Do you agree? 
Ah -- I see that your first patch modified vaddr *before* the code segment
above.  That would work in the case where the adjusted red-zone address
is used.  But in order to handle both cases, the patch will need to be
adjusted for when the base address is used unmodified. 
Dave