----- "Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar" <mahesh(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
On 11/17/2010 02:46 PM, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote on 11/16/2010 20:30:48:
>>> Please review the changes and send in your comments.
>>
>> Hello Mahesh,
>>
>> The patch-set looks good so far, except for one minor nit.
>>
>> Why is "S390" accepted as legitimate here in read_dump_header()?
>>
>> @@ -349,6 +352,10 @@ restart:
>> dd->machine_type = EM_IA_64;
>> else if (machine_type("PPC64"))
>> dd->machine_type = EM_PPC64;
>> + else if (machine_type("S390"))
>> + dd->machine_type = EM_S390;
>> + else if (machine_type("S390X"))
>> + dd->machine_type = EM_S390;
>> else {
>> error(INFO, "%s: unsupported machine type:
%s\n",
>> DISKDUMP_VALID() ? "diskdump" :
"compressed kdump",
>>
>
> Correct, machine_type("S390") can be removed, because we currently>
> can't have s390 31 bit ELF dumps or kdumps. And probably will never
> have.
>
> Michael
>
Will remove the machine_type("S390") and roll out new version of the
patch.
Thanks,
-Mahesh.
Hi Mahesh,
There's really no need to do that -- I can do it unless there are other
changes you need to make. I'm just waiting for somebody to make your two
dumpfiles available for me to download before I queue it for the next
release.
Thanks,
Dave