On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 3:23 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab(a)nec.com>
wrote:
 On 2024/03/08 12:18, Ming Wang wrote:
 > The following link error exists when building with LOONGARCH64
 > machine:
 >
 > /usr/bin/ld: proc-service.o: in function `.LVL71':
 > proc-service.c:(.text+0x324): undefined reference to `fill_gregset ...
 > /usr/bin/ld: proc-service.o: in function `.LVL77':
 > proc-service.c:(.text+0x364): undefined reference to `supply_gregset ...
 > /usr/bin/ld: proc-service.o: in function `.LVL87':
 > proc-service.c:(.text+0x3c4): undefined reference to `fill_fpregset ...
 > /usr/bin/ld: proc-service.o: in function `.LVL93':
 > proc-service.c:(.text+0x404): undefined reference to `supply_fpregset
 > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
 >
 > The cause of the error is that the definition of a function such as
 > fill_gregset is not implemented. This patch is used to fix this error.
 >
 > v1 -> v2:
 > Fix compilation errors.
 Thanks for the v2, the warnings are gone.  but I found another problem..
 When we add a patch to gdb-10.2.patch, a LOONGARCH64 build will fail with
 the following redefinition errors.  There is need to remove the gdb-10.2
 directory before rebuilding.  It looks like it's because the patch command
 cannot detect previously applied patches for newly created loongarch files,
 and those files get duplicated code..
 $ git am /tmp/0001-LoongArch64-Fixed-link-errors-when-build-on-LOO.patch
 Applying: LoongArch64: Fixed link errors when build on LOONGARCH64 machine
 $ make -j 16 warn target=LOONGARCH64
 ...
 patching file gdb-10.2/bfd/configure.ac
 Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Skipping patch.
 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
 patching file gdb-10.2/bfd/cpu-loongarch.c   <<-- cannot detect previously
 applied patch
 patching file gdb-10.2/bfd/elf-bfd.h
 patching file gdb-10.2/bfd/elf.c
 ...
 libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DBINDIR=\"/usr/local/bin\"
 -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -I. -I. -I./../include
 -DHAVE_loongarch_elf64_vec -DHAVE_loongarch_elf32_vec -DHAVE_elf64_le_vec
 -DHAVE_elf64_be_vec -DHAVE_elf32_le_vec -DHAVE_elf32_be_vec -W -Wall
 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Wstack-usage=262144
 -I./../zlib -g -O2 -MT elf-properties.lo -
 MD -MP -MF .deps/elf-properties.Tpo -c elf-properties.c -o elf-properties.o
 cpu-loongarch.c:86:33: error: redefinition of 'bfd_loongarch32_arch'
     static const bfd_arch_info_type bfd_loongarch32_arch =
                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 ...
 make: *** [Makefile:254: all] Error 2
 $ grep BFD gdb-10.2/bfd/cpu-loongarch.c
 /* BFD support for LoongArch.
       This file is part of BFD, the Binary File Descriptor library.
 /* BFD support for LoongArch.
       This file is part of BFD, the Binary File Descriptor library.
 I found that it's due to not using '/dev/null' for the newly added files
 in gdb-10.2.patch.  I'd like to fix this issue before applying this patch.
 I've attached two patches:
 - 1/2 fixes the issue above.
 - 2/2 is Ming's patch and I added "rm -f
 gdb-10.2/gdb/loongarch-linux-tdep.c"
    for the file modified multiple times (but not included in
 gdb-10.2.tar.gz.)
 
For these two patches: Ack.
Thanks
Lianbo
 Ming, Lianbo, could you check these?
 Thanks,
 Kazu
 >
 > Reported-by: Xiujie Jiang <jiangxiujie(a)kylinos.cn>
 > Signed-off-by: Ming Wang <wangming01(a)loongson.cn>
 > ---
 >   gdb-10.2.patch | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 >   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
 >
 > diff --git a/gdb-10.2.patch b/gdb-10.2.patch
 > index a7018a2..5d34407 100644
 > --- a/gdb-10.2.patch
 > +++ b/gdb-10.2.patch
 > @@ -16057,3 +16057,36 @@ exit 0
 >    m10200-dis.c
 >    m10200-opc.c
 >    m10300-dis.c
 > +--- gdb-10.2/gdb/loongarch-linux-tdep.c.orig
 > ++++ gdb-10.2/gdb/loongarch-linux-tdep.c
 > +@@ -707,3 +707,30 @@ _initialize_loongarch_linux_tdep ()
 > +   gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_loongarch, bfd_mach_loongarch64,
 > +                           GDB_OSABI_LINUX, loongarch_linux_init_abi);
 > + }
 > ++
 > ++/* Wrapper functions.  These are only used by libthread_db.  */
 > ++#include <sys/procfs.h>
 > ++extern void supply_gregset (struct regcache *regcache,const
 prgregset_t *gregset);
 > ++extern void fill_gregset (const struct regcache *regcache, prgregset_t
 *gregset, int regno);
 > ++extern void supply_fpregset (struct regcache *regcache, const
 prfpregset_t *fpregset);
 > ++extern void fill_fpregset (const struct regcache *regcache,
 prfpregset_t *fpregset, int regno);
 > ++
 > ++void supply_gregset (struct regcache *regcache, const prgregset_t
 *gregset)
 > ++{
 > ++  loongarch_elf_gregset.supply_regset (NULL, regcache, -1, gregset,
 sizeof (prgregset_t));
 > ++}
 > ++
 > ++void fill_gregset (const struct regcache *regcache, prgregset_t
 *gregset, int regno)
 > ++{
 > ++  loongarch_elf_gregset.collect_regset (NULL, regcache, regno,
 gregset, sizeof (prgregset_t));
 > ++}
 > ++
 > ++void supply_fpregset (struct regcache *regcache, const prfpregset_t
 *fpregset)
 > ++{
 > ++  loongarch_elf_fpregset.supply_regset (NULL, regcache, -1, fpregset,
 sizeof (prfpregset_t));
 > ++}
 > ++
 > ++void fill_fpregset (const struct regcache *regcache, prfpregset_t
 *fpregset, int regno)
 > ++{
 > ++  loongarch_elf_fpregset.collect_regset (NULL, regcache, regno,
 fpregset, sizeof (prfpregset_t));
 > ++}