Hi Dave,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> Hello Dave,
>
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:44:43 -0400 (EDT)
> Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I would have no problem with adding a new LIVE_DUMP flag to
> > pc->flags2, and just checking it in display_sys_stats() and
> > non_matching_kernel() as you've done below. In dealing with
> > dumpfiles generated from snap.so, the "bt" command is pretty
> > much the only command that probably should be restricted.
> > However, I don't restrict "bt" with snap.so vmcores because
> > currently there's no magic/signature/whatever that indicates
> > what kind of dump it is. But if you implement a new LIVE_DUMP
> > flag, I might do it there as well so we've got some consistency.
> >
> > What do you think about that?
>
> Sounds good. So what about introducing a new macro LIVE() that
> indicates that the dump or live system is inconsistent.
Good idea -- queued for crash-6.0.6.
Thanks!
Michael