Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH 0/1] extensions: proccgroup.c
----- Original Message -----
Hi Dave,
I build the proccgroup extensions on
https://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions/proccgroup.c.
and find a bug on centos 7. the following patch fix it.
Normally the owner/maintainer listed is responsible to accept any
changes to their module. But since it's an obvious fix, I have gone
ahead and updated https://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions/proccgroup.c
and I've cc'd the owner/maintainer.
I also want to ask another question:
Why not put various extensions in the extensions directory of the source code?
Because that would imply some expectation of ongoing support, and I am absolutely not
interested in doing that.
Thanks,
Dave
Wang Long (1):
extensions: proccgroup: fix the wrong method which detect whether to
support getting subsys name
extensions/proccgroup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
1.8.3.1