On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 11:06 -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
But your patch does this:
@@ -8117,8 +8135,9 @@ kmem_cache_s_array_nodes:
"array cache array", RETURN_ON_ERROR))
goto bail_out;
- for (i = max_limit = 0; (i < ARRAY_LENGTH(kmem_cache_s_array)) &&
- cpudata[i]; i++) {
+ for (i = max_limit = 0; (i < kmem_cache_nr_cpu)
+ && (i < ARRAY_LENGTH(kmem_cache_s_array))
+ && cpudata[i]; i++) {
if (!readmem(cpudata[i]+OFFSET(array_cache_limit),
KVADDR, &limit, sizeof(int),
"array cache limit", RETURN_ON_ERROR))
On "old" slab systems, your new "kmem_cache_nr_cpu" variable remains
at
its initialized value of zero, and the loop never gets entered. So I don't
think you wanted to keep the (i < kmem_cache_nr_cpu) there, right?
Of course you're right, sorry about that. I originally tried to fix the
problem by putting (i < kt->cpus) there before I fixed the array length,
then substituted instead of removing that clause.
> 2) kmem_cache structs can be allocated near enough to the edge of a page
> that the old incorrect length crosses the page boundary, even though the
> real smaller structure fits in the page. That caused a readmem of the
> structure to cross into a coincidentally missing page in the dump.
Right -- that was the genesis of the kmem_cache_downsize() function.
> This patch fixes both of those (after wrestling ARRAY_LENGTH to the
> ground), but *does not* fix the similar page crossing problem when I try
> to use a "struct kmem_cache" command on the particular structure at the
> end of the page.
Yeah, damn, I don't know what can be done for that, aside from some
horrific kludge to gdb_readmem_callback() to return successfully even
if the readmem() failed.
At least you won't see the problem on startup, only if you accidentally
ask for that particular struct.
Bob M.