Dave,
(Sorry for delayed response because I had one week vacation last week...)
----- Original Message -----
> Dave,
>
> > Initially Kazuhito will primarily be handling upstream github duties,
> > while Lianbo and Bhupesh will be handling Fedora, CentOS stream, and
> > RHEL maintenance. All three will be involved in the acceptance of
> > patches posted on this mailing list. Please welcome them in their
> > new roles; I am confident they will do a terrific job.
>
> Maybe, is it better to send patch set via github as PR from now on? I'm now
writing
> zram patch set for x86-64 support.
Hi Daisuke,
Good question -- and one that I shall defer the answer to the new maintainers.
Personally, I never accepted git pull requests because I always felt that
it was more valuable to expose proposed patches to the larger audience
that make up this mailing list. So when PRs came in, I coerced the
submitter to use the list.
Hagio-san and Bhupesh says they want to keep the current way
based the mailing list, and so I'll send the next patch set by
email.
>
> > Since the
https://people.redhat.com/anderson web page will be
> > decommissioned after my departure, its contents have been moved
> > to be co-located with the crash-utility github site:
> >
> >
https://crash-utility.github.io
>
> Do you plan to set a redirection from the current page? Rpm packages for
> crash's extension modules have URL in each rpm information like below and need
to
> modify it accordingly:
>
> # yum info crash-gcore-command
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, product-id, search-disabled-repos,
subscription-manager
> Available Packages
> Name : crash-gcore-command
> Arch : x86_64
> Version : 1.3.1
> Release : 0.el7
> Size : 41 k
> Repo : rhel-7-server-rpms/7Server/x86_64
> Summary : Gcore extension module for the crash utility
> URL :
http://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions/crash-gcore-command-1.3.1.ta...
> License : GPLv2
> Description : Command for creating a core dump file of a user-space task that
> : was running in a kernel dumpfile.
Yes, when the packages are updated, the URLs will have to be changed. During the build
procedure, the package verification will fail if the upstream URL is defunct.
Thanks. I'll make sure that when we update the packages next, and
redirection will be helpful.
>
> Also, when I want to release a new version of crash extnesion module, I send it to
Hagio-san via
> this mailing list as in the past, and then Hagio-san modifies the "crash
extension modules" page.
> Is this understanding correct?
Yes, and then Kazu, Liang or Bhupesh will be able to update that page.
I see.
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke