-----Original Message-----
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 2:40 PM lijiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update, Pingfan.
>
> The v9 change looks good to me. But I ran into some conflicts when
> applying these patches locally to test, so
> I would suggest submitting patches based on the latest crash code
> every time, which can also help Kazu save time
> although he will handle such issues.
>
> For the v9:
> Acked-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com>
>
Thanks for your review and help.
This series is based on commit eaf14f8 Fix 'waitq' command for Linux
4.13 and later kernels
To Kazu, should I post a rebase version? (I have tried to rebase it
against HEAD. It can rebase automatically)
There's no need to repost. The v9 patchset was cleanly applied on
the current head and built with 'make target=ARM64'.
Thanks,
Kazu