On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> For x86, crash avoids storing any '__crc_*' symbols. It should do the
> same for ARM, right? Credit goes to Rabin Vincent for this patch,
> unless you don't like it, in which case you can blame me.
I suppose. It was more of a clutter-reducer than anything else in
the case of x86. But I do note that the __crc_ symbols come after
"_end" in one of the sample ARM dumpfiles I've got on hand.
Clutter reduction is the reason for both of these patches as well and
even if the __crc_'s are ignored we'll still get _end+<offset>
printouts for everything in the range [_end, 0xff0a81a8]. Of course, a
patch for PRRR shouldn't break 'mod -s'. Here's an alternative patch.
/Per
Anyway, I don't have a problem with the patch. Mika?
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility