On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 10:35 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 24/11/15 10:17, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:09:01 +0000
> David Vrabel <david.vrabel(a)citrix.com> wrote:
>
> > On 24/11/15 09:55, Malcolm Crossley wrote:
> > > On 24/11/15 08:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > > On 24.11.15 at 07:55, <JGross(a)suse.com> wrote:
> > > > > What about:
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) Instead of relying on the kernel maintained p2m list for m2p
> > > > > conversion use the hypervisor maintained m2p list which
> > > > > should be
> > > > > available in the dump as well. This is the way the alive
> > > > > kernel is
> > > > > working, so mimic it during crash dump analysis.
> > > > I fully agree; I have to admit that looking at the p2m when doing
> > > > page
> > > > table walks for a PV Dom0 (having all machine addresses in page
> > > > table
> > > > entries) seems kind of backwards. (But I say this knowing nothing
> > > > about the tool.)
> > > >
> > > I don't think we can reliably use the m2p for PV domains because
> > > PV domains don't always issue a m2p update hypercall when they
> > > change
> > > their p2m mapping.
> > This only applies to foreign pages which won't be very interesting to
> > a
> > crash tool.
> True. I think the main reason crash hasn't done this is that it cannot
> find the hypervisor maintained m2p list. It should be sufficient to add
> some more fields to XEN_VMCOREINFO, so that crash can locate the
> mapping in the dump.
The M2P lives at an ABI-specified location in all virtual address spaces
for PV guests.
Either 0xF5800000 or 0xFFFF800000000000 depending on bitness.
In theory it can actually be dynamic. XENMEM_machphys_mapping is the way to
get at it (for both bitnesses).
For 64-bit guests I think that is most an "in theory" thing and it never
has actually been so.
For a 32-bit guest case I don't recall if it is just a 32on32 vs 32on64
thing, or if something (either guest or toolstack) gets to pick more
dynamically or even if it is a dom0 vs domU thing.
Ian.