On 11/18/2010 07:17 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
----- "Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar" <mahesh(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 02:46 PM, Michael Holzheu wrote:
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>> Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote on 11/16/2010 20:30:48:
>>>> Please review the changes and send in your comments.
>>>
>>> Hello Mahesh,
>>>
>>> The patch-set looks good so far, except for one minor nit.
>>>
>>> Why is "S390" accepted as legitimate here in read_dump_header()?
>>>
>>> @@ -349,6 +352,10 @@ restart:
>>> dd->machine_type = EM_IA_64;
>>> else if (machine_type("PPC64"))
>>> dd->machine_type = EM_PPC64;
>>> + else if (machine_type("S390"))
>>> + dd->machine_type = EM_S390;
>>> + else if (machine_type("S390X"))
>>> + dd->machine_type = EM_S390;
>>> else {
>>> error(INFO, "%s: unsupported machine type:
> %s\n",
>>> DISKDUMP_VALID() ? "diskdump" :
"compressed kdump",
>>>
>>
>> Correct, machine_type("S390") can be removed, because we currently>
>> can't have s390 31 bit ELF dumps or kdumps. And probably will never
>> have.
>>
>> Michael
>>
> Will remove the machine_type("S390") and roll out new version of the
> patch.
>
> Thanks,
> -Mahesh.
Hi Mahesh,
There's really no need to do that -- I can do it unless there are other
changes you need to make. I'm just waiting for somebody to make your two
dumpfiles available for me to download before I queue it for the next
release.
Thanks,
Dave
Thanks Dave. I have placed the dumpfiles on a different server and given
read access to Steve Best, he now should be able to get the files
available to you.
Thanks,
-Mahesh.