On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:29:27AM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:35:54AM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > >
> > > > > Now that PHYS_OFFSET is defined as "memstart_addr",
we can get the value
> > > > > if we can access this symbol (on a live system).
> > > >
> > > > When PHYS_OFFSET/memstart_addr is bumped up from the actual base of
physical
> > > > memory, is the physical memory below it no longer used/accessible?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is! That is what Ard has managed to do in his series of
> > > KASLR-related patches.
> >
> > How is it accessed via a kernel virtual address? Or is only accessible when
> > mapped into a vmalloc() or user-space address?
>
> Through a linear(unity) mapping above PAGE_OFFSET.
I'm still confused...
Does PAGE_OFFSET+0 still refer to PHYS_OFFSET?
No, it doesn't if CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_RAM.
See a kernel boot message about "Virtual kernel memory layout"
That is why PHYS_OFFSET can now be negative.
Thanks,
Tahahiro AKASHI
I'm trying to wrap my head around
how __virt_to_phys() would work for the memory below the bumped-up PHYS_OFFSET.
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
--
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI