Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 13:23 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
> This message was bounced due to its size of its attachment;
> I've since bumped up the maximum allowable message size:
>
>
> Re: [Crash-utility] crash 4.0-2.8 fails on 2.6.14-rc5
> (EM64T)
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:15:47 -0700
> From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari(a)us.ibm.com>
> To: <crash-utility(a)redhat.com>
> References: 1, 2, 3, 4
>
I already sent you the changed routines (since it didn't let me
send the whole file). I haven't touched any other routines, if
you want to the whole file - I can send it again.
Right -- but like I said in the last message (did you see my comments
within it?) your changes are exactly what I suggested, and I don't
see why they would cause a problem. But check out my last post
for why I think it may have something to do with the per-cpu data
structure handling in the x86_64 kernel.
Dave
Thanks,
Badari
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility