[Crash-utility] [RESEND] Re: [PATCH 00/11] sadump: Incremental update patches
I don't know what it is about Daisuke's mail, but when I respond to them
with my Zimbra mailer, the archived version gets screwed up for some reason:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/2011-October/msg00091.html
The same thing happened last month when I responded to another of Daisuke's
emails.
Anyway, I believe the digested version will be OK, but in order to archive this
message properly, here it is again:
----- Original Message -----
... [ cut ] ...
> If I remove the
"use_regs_in_elf_notes_on_kdump_fmt_from_sadump.patch.patch" patch
> the backtraces are correct. Now, it may be true that the changes you made make
> sense with respect to sadump dumpfiles, where the register set stored in the header
> is a reflection of the last location that each cpu ran (?).
>
> But those changes are totally unacceptable for compressed kdump dumpfiles.
I undestand the situtation.
I attach V2 patch. I confirmed this doesn't break the logic explained
above. Could you review this?
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
Hello Daisuke,
This v2 version tests OK.
The sadump patchset, plus this updated patch, are queued for crash-6.0.0.
Thanks,
Dave