Hello Jan,
Can you try with option --cpus=4 passed when your start the crash.
I used 4 here because i have 4 cores.
Thanks,
Arun
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Karlsson, Jan <Jan.Karlsson(a)sonymobile.com>
wrote:
Hi
Unfortunately I found another older example where my patch below did not
work.
In that one only cpu 0 where online but 0,1,2,3 where active. So maybe:
return MAX(get_cpus_active(),
get_highest_cpu_online()+1);
might work better. Someone with better knowledge about this than I have
should look at the problem.
Jan
*Jan Karlsson*
Senior Software Engineer
System Assurance
*Sony Mobile Communications*
Tel: +46 703 062 174
jan.karlsson(a)sonymobile.com <Firstname.Lastname(a)sonymobile.com>
sonymobile.com
[image: Sony logotype_23px height_Email_144dpi]
*From:* Karlsson, Jan
*Sent:* den 15 oktober 2014 10:49
*To:* Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development
*Subject:*
Hi
I have seen a problem when it comes to the number of cpus for ARM
(32-bits).
static int
arm_get_smp_cpus(void)
{
return MAX(get_cpus_active(),
get_cpus_online());
}
In one of my example, "help -k" gives me:
cpu_possible_map: 0 1 2 3
cpu_present_map: 0 1 2 3
cpu_online_map: 0 3
cpu_active_map: 3
So the number of cpus will become 2. However there are code in a number of
places that will then only accept cpu 0 and 1 as cpus to handle.
When I changed to code to be the same as for ARM64 things worked as
expected:
static int
arm_get_smp_cpus(void)
{
return MAX(get_cpus_online(),
get_highest_cpu_online()+1);
}
Jan
*Jan Karlsson*
Senior Software Engineer
System Assurance
*Sony Mobile Communications*
Tel: +46 703 062 174
jan.karlsson(a)sonymobile.com <Firstname.Lastname(a)sonymobile.com>
sonymobile.com
[image: Sony logotype_23px height_Email_144dpi]
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility