Hi, Kazu
Thanks for your review. Sorry, I forgot to send to the mailing list. So send it again.
On 12/13/23 12:57, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) wrote:
Hi Ming,
sorry for the delay.
On 2023/11/08 10:39, Ming Wang wrote:
> @@ -512,6 +527,10 @@ get_current_configuration(struct supported_gdb_version *sp)
> (target_data.target != MIPS64))
> arch_mismatch(sp);
>
> + if ((target_data.initial_gdb_target == LOONGARCH64) &&
> + (target_data.target != LOONGARCH64))
> + arch_mismatch(sp);
> +
Please add the "if (target_data.target == X86_64)" block same as
RISCV64 and etc. otherwise implied (sticky) target does not work:
$ make target=LOONGARCH64
...
$ make # without target
The initial build in this source tree was for the LOONGARCH64 architecture.
In order to build a crash binary for the X86_64 architecture:
1. remove the gdb-10.2 subdirectory
2. perform a "make clean"
3. retry the build
make: *** [Makefile:253: all] Error 1
$
Ok, I will fix it in V3.
> @@ -2227,6 +2233,8 @@ struct offset_table { /*
stash of commonly-used offsets */
> long module_memory_size;
> long irq_data_irq;
> long zspage_huge;
> + long task_struct_thread_reg01;
> + long task_struct_thread_reg03;
These are not used in this patch, could you move to 05/10?
Ok, I will fix it in
V3.
> diff --git a/gdb-10.2.patch b/gdb-10.2.patch
> index d81030d..c28fc38 100644
Could you add "gdb-10.2/bfd/elf-bfd.h" and "gdb-10.2/gdb/objfiles.h"
to the list of the restored files at the beginning of gdb-10.2.patch?
Please see the comment there for details. Now they each have two fixes.
I'm very sorry that I don't understand how to modify it here. Does it mean to
merge the modifications of the same file together?
Thanks,
Ming