1:30 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
> Another question re: your patch -- is it possible to have a
"depth" greater
> than 1?
Yes, "depth" could be greater than 1, see the example below:
CPU 0 RUNQUEUE: ffff880028216680
CURRENT: PID: 17085 TASK: ffff880137c63540 COMMAND: "bash"
RT PRIO_ARRAY: ffff880028216808 <-- depth =
0
[ 0] PID: 17129 TASK: ffff880037aeaaa0 COMMAND: "rtloop99"
PID: 2832 TASK: ffff88013b09cae0 COMMAND: "rtkit-daemon"
PID: 6 TASK: ffff88013d7c6080 COMMAND: "watchdog/0"
[ 1] GROUP RT PRIO_ARRAY: ffff88002ca65000 <-- depth =
1
[ 1] GROUP RT PRIO_ARRAY: ffff880015821000 <-- depth =
2
[ 1] PID: 17126 TASK: ffff880135d2a040 COMMAND:
"rtloop98"
[ 98] PID: 17119 TASK: ffff88010190d500 COMMAND: "rtloop1"
PID: 17121 TASK: ffff88013bd27500 COMMAND: "rtloop1"
PID: 17120 TASK: ffff88010190caa0 COMMAND: "rtloop1"
CFS RB_ROOT: ffff880028216718
...
Hmm, I think the depth could not be that big. So how do you think
this
kind of output.
The attached patch just changed "CHILD" to "GROUP".
Interesting -- how did you set up the depth-greater-than-one scenario?
Anyway, given that it is possible, let's at least tighten up the output display
by changing each "9 * depth" usage to be "6 * depth". That should
alter
your example output to look like this:
CPU 0 RUNQUEUE: ffff880028216680
CURRENT: PID: 17085 TASK: ffff880137c63540 COMMAND: "bash"
RT PRIO_ARRAY: ffff880028216808
[ 0] PID: 17129 TASK: ffff880037aeaaa0 COMMAND: "rtloop99"
PID: 2832 TASK: ffff88013b09cae0 COMMAND: "rtkit-daemon"
PID: 6 TASK: ffff88013d7c6080 COMMAND: "watchdog/0"
[ 1] GROUP RT PRIO_ARRAY: ffff88002ca65000
[ 1] GROUP RT PRIO_ARRAY: ffff880015821000
[ 1] PID: 17126 TASK: ffff880135d2a040 COMMAND: "rtloop98"
[ 98] PID: 17119 TASK: ffff88010190d500 COMMAND: "rtloop1"
PID: 17121 TASK: ffff88013bd27500 COMMAND: "rtloop1"
PID: 17120 TASK: ffff88010190caa0 COMMAND: "rtloop1"
CFS RB_ROOT: ffff880028216718
...
And also, I'd prefer to not create the dangling "static int depth",
but rather to add a depth argument to dump_RT_prio_array(), where
dump_CFS_runqueues() passes a 0, and dump_RT_prio_array() passes
"depth+1" to itself:
static void
dump_RT_prio_array(int depth, ulong k_prio_array, char *u_prio_array)
{
int i, c, tot, cnt, qheads;
ulong offset, kvaddr, uvaddr;
ulong list_head[2];
struct list_data list_data, *ld;
struct task_context *tc;
ulong *tlist;
ulong my_q, task_addr;
char *rt_rq_buf;
if (!depth)
fprintf(fp, " RT PRIO_ARRAY: %lx\n", k_prio_array);
qheads = (i = ARRAY_LENGTH(rt_prio_array_queue)) ?
i : get_array_length("rt_prio_array.queue", NULL,
SIZE(list_head));
ld = &list_data;
for (i = tot = 0; i < qheads; i++) {
offset = OFFSET(rt_prio_array_queue) + (i * SIZE(list_head));
kvaddr = k_prio_array + offset;
uvaddr = (ulong)u_prio_array + offset;
BCOPY((char *)uvaddr, (char *)&list_head[0], sizeof(ulong)*2);
if (CRASHDEBUG(1))
fprintf(fp, "rt_prio_array[%d] @ %lx => %lx/%lx\n",
i, kvaddr, list_head[0], list_head[1]);
if ((list_head[0] == kvaddr) && (list_head[1] == kvaddr))
continue;
INDENT(5 + 6 * depth);
fprintf(fp, "[%3d] ", i);
BZERO(ld, sizeof(struct list_data));
ld->start = list_head[0];
if (VALID_MEMBER(task_struct_rt) &&
VALID_MEMBER(sched_rt_entity_run_list))
ld->list_head_offset = OFFSET(sched_rt_entity_run_list);
else
ld->list_head_offset = OFFSET(task_struct_run_list);
ld->end = kvaddr;
hq_open();
cnt = do_list(ld);
hq_close();
tlist = (ulong *)GETBUF((cnt) * sizeof(ulong));
cnt = retrieve_list(tlist, cnt);
for (c = 0; c < cnt; c++) {
task_addr = tlist[c];
if (VALID_MEMBER(sched_rt_entity_my_q)) {
readmem(tlist[c] + OFFSET(sched_rt_entity_my_q),
KVADDR, &my_q, sizeof(ulong), "my_q",
FAULT_ON_ERROR);
if (my_q) {
rt_rq_buf = GETBUF(SIZE(rt_rq));
readmem(my_q, KVADDR, rt_rq_buf,
SIZE(rt_rq), "rt_rq",
FAULT_ON_ERROR);
if (c)
INDENT(11 + 6 * depth);
fprintf(fp, "GROUP RT PRIO_ARRAY: %lx\n",
my_q + OFFSET(rt_rq_active));
tot++;
dump_RT_prio_array(depth+1,
my_q + OFFSET(rt_rq_active),
&rt_rq_buf[OFFSET(rt_rq_active)]);
continue;
} else
task_addr -= OFFSET(task_struct_rt);
}
if (!(tc = task_to_context(task_addr)))
continue;
if (c)
INDENT(11 + 6 * depth);
fprintf(fp, "PID: %-5ld TASK: %lx COMMAND: \"%s\"\n",
tc->pid, tc->task, tc->comm);
tot++;
}
FREEBUF(tlist);
}
if (!tot) {
INDENT(5 + 6 * depth);
fprintf(fp, "[no tasks queued]\n");
}
}
Can you verify that those changes work for you?
Thanks,
Dave