----- Original Message -----
 Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com> writes:
 
 > That's kind of cluttered -- I was thinking of something like this:
 >
 > crash> kmem ffffea0004de2c00
 > CACHE            NAME                 OBJSIZE  ALLOCATED     TOTAL  SLABS
 > SSIZE
 > ffff88013a719900 ext4_inode_cache        2200        730       742     53
 > 32k
 >   SLAB              MEMORY            NODE  TOTAL  ALLOCATED  FREE
 >   RED_ZONE
 >   ffffea0004de2c00  ffff8801378b0000     0     14          2    12      8
 >   FREE / [ALLOCATED]
 >    ffff8801378b0000  (cpu 0 cache)
 >   [ffff8801378b08b8]
 >
 > or better yet, this:
 >
 > crash> kmem ffffea0004de2c00
 > CACHE            NAME                 OBJSIZE  ALLOCATED     TOTAL  SLABS
 > SSIZE
 > ffff88013a719900 ext4_inode_cache        2200        730       742     53
 > 32k
 >   SLAB              MEMORY            NODE  TOTAL  ALLOCATED  FREE
 >   ffffea0004de2c00  ffff8801378b0000     0     14          2    12
 >   FREE / [ALLOCATED] SLAB_RED_ZONE: 8
 >    ffff8801378b0000  (cpu 0 cache)
 >   [ffff8801378b08b8]
 
 I see what you say. However, my usual usage of kmem is to get the data
 address of object (I was thinking the most users are same usage).
 
 	crash> kmem <pointer in stack>
 	info for data address
 
 	copy & paste <data address>
 	crash> p *(struct inode *)<data address> 
Why not copy-and-paste the address from <pointer in stack>?  Or use "bt
-FF"
to get the kmem cache type, and skip using "kmem" entirely?  ;-)
Dave
 
 So I want to display <data address> itself (btw, cluttered is same with
 "cpu %d cache").  BTW, ->red_left_pad itself can get from CACHE's
 address, so if displaying <data address> is unacceptable, I would not
 have big interest to add ->red_left_pad itself.
 
 If this usage is only me, unfortunate though, I will apply this patch by
 myself.
 
 Thanks.
 --
 OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi(a)mail.parknet.co.jp>