8:28 p.m.
Hi Lianbo,
thanks for working on this.
-----Original Message-----
Kernel commit <80ee81e0403c> ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based
memory
accounting infra for bpf maps") removed the struct bpf_map_memory
member from struct bpf_map. Without the patch, "bpf -m|-M" options
will print the following errors:
crash> bpf -m 1
ID BPF_MAP BPF_MAP_TYPE MAP_FLAGS
1 ffff96ba41804400 ARRAY 00000000
KEY_SIZE: 4 VALUE_SIZE: 8 MAX_ENTRIES: 64 MEMLOCK: (unknown)
^^^^^^^
NAME: "dist" UID: (unknown)
^^^^^^^
Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com>
---
bpf.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bpf.c b/bpf.c
index cb6b0ed385f9..d45e9ab9311b 100644
--- a/bpf.c
+++ b/bpf.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
*/
#include "defs.h"
+#include <stdbool.h>
struct bpf_info {
ulong status;
@@ -63,6 +64,66 @@ static int do_old_idr(int, ulong, struct list_pair *);
#define PROG_VERBOSE (0x40)
#define MAP_VERBOSE (0x80)
+static bool map_is_per_cpu(ulong type)
I think that int is enough here and stdbool.h can be removed.
(also type is int originally.)
+{
+ /*
+ * See the definition of bpf_map_type:
+ * include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+ */
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH (5UL)
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY (6UL)
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH (10UL)
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE (21UL)
This #define style in function looks unusual.. please let me change.
+
+ return type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY ||
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH ||
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE;
+}
+
+static bool map_is_fd_map(ulong type)
+{
+ /*
+ * See the definition of bpf_map_type:
+ * include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+ */
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY (3UL)
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY (4UL)
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY (8UL)
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS (12UL)
+ #define BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS (13UL)
Ditto.
+
+ return type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY ||
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY ||
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY ||
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS ||
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS;
+
+}
+
+static ulong bpf_map_memory_size(ulong map_type, ulong vsize, ulong ksize, ulong esize)
The arguments are int and uint, and let's sync with kernel for readability.
static ulong bpf_map_memory_size(int map_type, uint value_size,
uint key_size, uint max_entries)
+{
+ ulong memsize,valsize;
+ int cpus = 0;
+
+ valsize = vsize;
+
+ if (map_is_fd_map(map_type))
+ valsize = sizeof(ulong);
This should be uint.
else if (IS_FD_MAP(map))
return sizeof(u32);
+
+ if (map_is_per_cpu(map_type)) {
+ cpus = get_cpus_possible();
+ if (!cpus)
+ error(WARNING, "cpu_possible_map does not exist, pissible cpus: %d\n",
cpus);
s/pissible/possible/
And if this fails, I think it would be better to print "(unknown)", so
let's return 0 here.
+
+ valsize = roundup(vsize, 8) * cpus;
+ }
+
+ memsize = roundup((ksize + valsize), 8);
+
+ return roundup((esize * memsize), PAGESIZE());
+}
+
void
cmd_bpf(void)
{
@@ -332,7 +393,7 @@ do_bpf(ulong flags, ulong prog_id, ulong map_id, int radix)
{
struct bpf_info *bpf;
int i, c, found, entries, type;
- uint uid, map_pages, key_size, value_size, max_entries;
+ uint uid, map_pages, key_size = 0, value_size = 0, max_entries = 0;
ulong bpf_prog_aux, bpf_func, end_func, addr, insnsi, user;
ulong do_progs, do_maps;
ulonglong load_time;
@@ -603,7 +664,7 @@ do_map_only:
map_pages = UINT(bpf->bpf_map_buf + OFFSET(bpf_map_pages));
fprintf(fp, "%d\n", map_pages * PAGESIZE());
} else
- fprintf(fp, "(unknown)\n");
+ fprintf(fp, "%ld\n", bpf_map_memory_size(type, value_size, key_size,
max_entries));
Then, how about this?
+ } else if (memory = bpf_map_memory_size(type, value_size,
key_size, max_entries))
+ fprintf(fp, "%ld\n", memory);
+ else
+ fprintf(fp, "(unknown)");
I've attached a modified patch, could you check?
Thanks,
Kazu
fprintf(fp, " NAME: ");
if (VALID_MEMBER(bpf_map_name)) {
@@ -632,7 +693,7 @@ do_map_only:
else
fprintf(fp, "(unknown)\n");
} else
- fprintf(fp, "(unknown)\n");
+ fprintf(fp, "(unused)\n");
}
if (flags & DUMP_STRUCT) {
--
2.20.1