----- "Sergey Svishchev" <svs(a)ropnet.ru> wrote:
Dave Anderson wrote:
>> See also
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crash/+bug/559219
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Svishchev
>
> BTW, if you follow the advice in the ubuntu bug description, does
> the crash session work normally?
(It's my bug report :-)
Yes, mostly. Date is wrong (DATE: Sun Oct 26 03:35:21 2594), 'bt'
reports some errors but otherwise backtraces look sane.
crash> bt
PID: 0 TASK: ffffffff81796600 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "swapper"
#0 [ffffffff8176fe58] schedule at ffffffff81525251
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 41 type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 1587b type: "call byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 6db6db6db6db6db2 type: "call
byte"
bt: invalid kernel virtual address: 937fb type: "call byte"
#1 [ffffffff8176ff00] cpu_idle at ffffffff81010e45
--
Sergey Svishchev
Yeah, something is still askew. I just got this from Paolo Bonzini,
the author of the qemu-related code in crash:
> By any chance do you have any insights re: the
structure-related
> changes associated with CPU_SAVE_VERSION?. This is an upstream bug
> report, but I note that in qemu-kvm-0.11.0-rc1.fc12.i686, it's equal
> to 10 in target-i386/cpu.h.
It needs an update for newer qemus. I'll take a look, as probably
we'd want this on RHEL6 too (or maybe not, I used crash/kvm on RHEL6
about a month ago).
Paolo
Please keep that dump around for an upcoming test patch...
Thanks,
Dave