Re: [Crash-utility] [External Mail][????] Re: ramdump support for va_bits_actual

Hi I made almost the same patch to fix the problem with arm64 in version 5.4... One very small change can merged together,vmemmap_start has a little error: [arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h] 56 #define VMEMMAP_START (-VMEMMAP_SIZE - SZ_2M) in crash arm64.c - vmemmap_start = (-vmemmap_size); + vmemmap_start = (-vmemmap_size - MEGABYTES(2));

BTW,in arm64_VTOP,it's easier to use the physvirt_offset directly @@ -1148,8 +1155,7 @@ arm64_VTOP(ulong addr) } if (addr >= machdep->machspec->page_offset) - return machdep->machspec->phys_offset - + (addr - machdep->machspec->page_offset); + return (addr + machdep->machspec->physvirt_offset);

________________________________________ From: crash-utility-bounces(a)redhat.com <crash-utility-bounces(a)redhat.com&gt; on behalf of Dave Anderson <anderson(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 0:32 To: Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development Subject: [External Mail][????] Re: [Crash-utility] ramdump support for va_bits_actual ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Dave, > > Noticed that raw ramdumps of 5.4 kernel aren't working with crash tip. > With the patches attached, I could get it working. Please take a look. > > Thanks, > Vinayak > Hi Vinayak, A couple quick questions come to mind... First, I haven't checked all possible READMEM plugins, but for example, if this function is run on a live system, the -1 file descriptor would cause the READMEM() call to fail: static void +arm64_calc_physvirt_offset(void) +{ + struct machine_specific *ms = machdep->machspec; + ulong physvirt_offset; + struct syment *sp; + + ms->physvirt_offset = ms->phys_offset - ms->page_offset; + + if ((sp = kernel_symbol_search("physvirt_offset")) && + machdep->machspec->kimage_voffset) { + if (READMEM(-1, &physvirt_offset, sizeof(physvirt_offset), + sp->value, sp->value - + machdep->machspec->kimage_voffset) > 0) { + ms->physvirt_offset = physvirt_offset; + } + } + + if (CRASHDEBUG(1)) + fprintf(fp, "using %lx as physvirt_offset\n", ms->physvirt_offset); +} And here -- are you missing some brackets? (run "make warn") But regardless of that, why are you setting it back to 48 if it's greater than 48? diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c index 31d6e90..04efc13 100644 --- a/arm64.c +++ b/arm64.c @@ -4011,6 +4011,7 @@ arm64_calc_virtual_memory_ranges(void) struct machine_specific *ms = machdep->machspec; ulong value, vmemmap_start, vmemmap_end, vmemmap_size, vmalloc_end; char *string; + int ret; ulong PUD_SIZE = UNINITIALIZED; if (!machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS) { @@ -4018,6 +4019,12 @@ arm64_calc_virtual_memory_ranges(void) value = atol(string); free(string); machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS = value; + } else if (kt->ikconfig_flags & IKCONFIG_AVAIL) { + if ((ret = get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS", + &string)) == IKCONFIG_STR) + machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS = atol(string); + if (machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS > 48) + machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS = 48; } } Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility #/******本邮件及其附件含有小米公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！ This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from XIAOMI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!******/# -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility