On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 1:10 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
<k-hagio-ab(a)nec.com> wrote:
 -----Original Message-----
 > > (BTW, at a glance I'm not sure why the 2nd stage is needed...
 > > sp_hashed was already checked with STREQ in symname_hash_search if found,
 > > otherwise st->synmane_hash should include all kernel symbols..)
 > >
 > Hello Kazu,
 >
 > Yes, from my view I also think the 2nd stage is not necessary, I have
 > thought about removing
 > it as well, but I just don't want to go too far at one step. :-)
 OK, I see.
 > > One more, do you have any slow command that will be especially improved
 > > by the patch?  I'm ok with the sym command taking 3ms :-)
 > > I'd like to know why the patch should be applied or how much the worst
 > > command etc. will be improved, to see the importance of it.
 > >
 >
 > No, I don't have a specific slow command. Because the modified functions
 > symbol_search and symbol_exists are fundamental and widely used by
 > other crash functions, thus the benefit of performance improvement can
 > get accumulated. In addition, the time consumption for T3 shortened greatly,
 > from 2.4 to 0.017, maybe this can be one of the reasons.
 OK.
 As far as I've checked a large machine (with 192 CPUs), there are not many
 commands but several commands call symbol_search and symbol_exists returning
 "not found" many times:
       symbol_search  symbol_exists
        found  NULL    found  NULL
 startup   95    21       29    21
 ps -m   1951  1951        0     0
 irq     1850     0        0 13448
 irq -a  1850     0      884 10777
 irq -s  1850     0      884 10777
 timer    193   193        0     0
 Actually, these commands were obviously improved by the patch.
 So let's add some explanation like this to the commit log:
 
Thanks for the testing.
 " symbol_search and symbol_exists are fundamental and widely
used by
 other crash functions, thus the benefit of performance improvement can
 get accumulated.  For example, "ps -m" and "irq" commands, which
call
 the functions many times, will become faster with the patch."
 Anyway, I'll review the patch, please wait for a while.
 
Thank you very much for the patch review! I will send new versions of the patch
with the updated commit log.
Thanks,
Tao Liu
 Thanks,
 Kazu
 --
 Crash-utility mailing list
 Crash-utility(a)redhat.com
 
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility