Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH] Fix memory driver module build with kernel 5.8+

Hi Kazu Sorry for the delayed reply, On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 2:34 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾　一仁) <k-hagio-ab(a)nec.com&gt; wrote: > > Hi Bhupesh, > > I looked this discussion over again, but I'm not sure what kind of > implementation and code comment you were suggesting. As for > backporting the patch, I thought the commit log would be enough.. > > Do you think we should not merge this as is? No problem. I only had some nitpicks. We can go ahead and apply the same for now - maybe later on if someone finds more time we can clean this up further.

Feel free to add: Acked-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma(a)redhat.com&gt; Thanks. > > -----Original Message----- > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 02:05:21 +0530 > > Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > Hi Petr, > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. I have some nitpicks, please see inline: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 7:24 PM Petr Tesarik <ptesarik(a)suse.cz&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > > Kernel commit fe557319aa06c23cffc9346000f119547e0f289a renamed > > > > probe_kernel_{read,write} to copy_{from,to}_kernel_nofault. > > > > > > > > Additionally, commit 0493cb086353e786be56010780a0b7025b5db34c > > > > unexported probe_kernel_write(), so writing kernel memory is > > > > no longer possible from a module. > > > > > > > > I have renamed the functions in source, but I'm also adding wrappers to > > > > allow building the module with older kernel versions. > > > > > > > > Without this patch, build with kernel 5.8 and later fails: > > > > > > > > kbuild/default/crash.c: In function 'crash_write': > > > > kbuild/default/crash.c:189:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'probe_kernel_write'; did you > > mean 'kernel_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > 189 | if (probe_kernel_write(vaddr, buffer, count)) { > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > | kernel_write > > > > kbuild/default/crash.c: In function 'crash_read': > > > > kbuild/default/crash.c:225:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'probe_kernel_read'; did you > > mean 'kernel_read'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > 225 | if (probe_kernel_read(buffer, vaddr, count)) { > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > | kernel_read > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik(a)suse.com&gt; > > > > > > > > --- > > > > memory_driver/crash.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > --- a/memory_driver/crash.c > > > > +++ b/memory_driver/crash.c > > > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > > > > *****************************************************************************/ > > > > > > > > #include <linux/module.h> > > > > +#include <linux/version.h> > > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > > #include <linux/miscdevice.h> > > > > #include <linux/init.h> > > > > @@ -37,6 +38,22 @@ > > > > > > > > extern int page_is_ram(unsigned long); > > > > > > > > +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(5, 8, 0) > > > > + > > > > +#define CAN_WRITE_KERNEL > > > 1 > > > > > > Hmmm.. I have no strong opinion about this, but can I suggest using a > > > simple variable instead of a macro. > > > Something like a 'unsigned int version_info': > > > > > > unsigned int version_info = LINUX_VERSION_CODE; > > > > > > and then perform the check in the code at run time against the 'version_info'. > > > > I'm not sure how to implement this. Kernel 5.8+ does not export any > > symbol that could be used for writing, so I cannot even build the code > > that needs it. > > > > Are you suggesting to use a function pointer and initialize it using > > symbol_get()? > > > > > To me, it seems more portable in future, as we are seeing such issues > > > with newer kernels (due to function name renaming/deprecation). > > > > > > Another minor nitpick: Can I suggest adding a comment to this code leg > > > - this can help while backporting patches to distributions (which > > > still work with older kernel versions) - as it helps making a better > > > informed decision while backporting the patch. > > > > OK, I get it that this would not be needed if I use symbol_get(), > > correct? > > > > Petr T > > > > > > + > > > > +static inline long copy_from_kernel_nofault(void *dst, const void > > > > *src, size_t size) +{ > > > > + return probe_kernel_read(dst, src, size); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static inline long copy_to_kernel_nofault(void *dst, const void > > > > *src, size_t size) +{ > > > > + return probe_kernel_write(dst, src, size); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +#endif > > > > + > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_S390 > > > > /* > > > > * For swapped prefix pages get bounce buffer using > > > > xlate_dev_mem_ptr() @@ -160,6 +177,8 @@ crash_llseek(struct file * > > > > file, loff_t } > > > > } > > > > > > > > +#ifdef CAN_WRITE_KERNEL > > > > + > > > > static ssize_t > > > > crash_write(struct file *file, const char *buf, size_t count, > > > > loff_t *poff) { > > > > @@ -186,7 +205,7 @@ crash_write(struct file *file, const cha > > > > return -EFAULT; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - if (probe_kernel_write(vaddr, buffer, count)) { > > > > + if (copy_to_kernel_nofault(vaddr, buffer, count)) { > > > > unmap_virtual(page); > > > > return -EFAULT; > > > > } > > > > @@ -197,6 +216,8 @@ crash_write(struct file *file, const cha > > > > return written; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +#endif > > > > + > > > > /* > > > > * Determine the page address for an address offset value, > > > > * get a virtual address for it, and copy it out. > > > > @@ -222,7 +243,7 @@ crash_read(struct file *file, char *buf, > > > > * Use bounce buffer to bypass the CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY > > > > * kernel text restriction. > > > > */ > > > > - if (probe_kernel_read(buffer, vaddr, count)) { > > > > + if (copy_from_kernel_nofault(buffer, vaddr, count)) { > > > > unmap_virtual(page); > > > > return -EFAULT; > > > > } > > > > @@ -294,7 +315,9 @@ static struct file_operations crash_fops > > > > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > > > .llseek = crash_llseek, > > > > .read = crash_read, > > > > +#ifdef CAN_WRITE_KERNEL > > > > .write = crash_write, > > > > +#endif > > > > .unlocked_ioctl = crash_ioctl, > > > > .open = crash_open, > > > > .release = crash_release, > > > > -- > > > > Crash-utility mailing list > > > > Crash-utility(a)redhat.com > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > > > > > > With the above points addressed, please feel free to add: > > > > > > Acked-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > > Crash-utility mailing list > > > Crash-utility(a)redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > > > >