Re: [Crash-utility] [ANNOUNCE] My retirement, and crash utility maintainership changes

> > Dave, > > > > > Initially Kazuhito will primarily be handling upstream github duties, > > > while Lianbo and Bhupesh will be handling Fedora, CentOS stream, and > > > RHEL maintenance. All three will be involved in the acceptance of > > > patches posted on this mailing list. Please welcome them in their > > > new roles; I am confident they will do a terrific job. > > > > Maybe, is it better to send patch set via github as PR from now on? I'm now writing > > zram patch set for x86-64 support. > > Hi Daisuke, > > Good question -- and one that I shall defer the answer to the new maintainers. > > Personally, I never accepted git pull requests because I always felt that > it was more valuable to expose proposed patches to the larger audience > that make up this mailing list. So when PRs came in, I coerced the > submitter to use the list. I'm thinking that we continue this way as-is and I'd like to do so because of the same reason Dave says. Crash's watchers [1] receives Issues/PR emails, but there are 55 people now (although the number would increase if we use GitHub mainly), while the crash-utility mailing list has several hundreds members. (And I personally think that it's easier to discuss things via email, which I'm used to.) If it's hard for us to continue the way or using GitHub looks much more efficient in the future, then we can shift it to a GitHub way. [1] https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/watchers