On 2022/12/26 16:43, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) wrote:
 On 2022/12/26 16:08, lijiang wrote:
>> Isn't this better?  If no NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE, there is no need to
>> search for NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE.
>>
>>
> Originally, I had the same idea as you.  But later, I noticed that there
> was too much duplication of code. So, eventually I used the current fix.
>
> But anyway, if you would prefer the following change, It's also good to me.
 
 ok, it doesn't look too redundant to me :) and the following
 corresponds to the kernel change logically and can avoid an
 unnecessary call on 5.9 and later.
 
 will change and merge later.
 
Applied with that change.
https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/41d4b85ea50efc733df65ec8421...
Thanks,
Kazu