Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH] Use backtrace() instead of __builtin_return_address()

Bernhard Walle wrote: > > * Dave Anderson [2008-05-14 11:11]: >> I suppose we could go with 5 instead of 4, and have dump_trace() >> skip the first one, presuming that this anomoly is not architecture- >> or compiler-dependent. Or maybe make it macro? > > Did you compile with some optimisation? I think I remember that gcc > only inlines code with optimisation turned on. > No -- the Makefile is used as is -- you're the one modifying things... ;-)