Hi Dave, The rb_root pointer is pretty useless in our debugging. I thought about removing it but decided not to do it thinking other people may need it. I can get you another patch that removes the rb_root display from the "group" line. Please let me know what you think.

Thanks, Anthony > -----Original Message----- > From: crash-utility-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:crash-utility- > bounces(a)redhat.com] On Behalf Of Dave Anderson > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:51 PM > To: Discussion list for crash utility usage, maintenance and > development > Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] patch for slight modification to runq -g > command > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > My mistake, I didn't read your email carefully enough. Here's the > > > new > > > patch. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Anthony > > > > Thanks Anthony -- your changes are queued for crash-7.0.4. > > > > Dave > > Anthony, > > Given your interest in this command, I have a question re: the display. > > Do you ever have any interest in the rb_root addresses in each group? > I'm thinking that with your patch adding the task_group and cfs_rq > addresses, that the rb_root address is fairly useless. It was > pretty much carried forward from the base "runq" command display, > where it makes some sense. > > Dave > > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > Crash-utility(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility