Hi Lianbo,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 3:58 PM lijiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:28 AM Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi lianbo,
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 2:41 PM lijiang <lijiang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Tao
> >
> > Thank you for the fix.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 7:44 AM
<devel-request(a)lists.crash-utility.osci.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:42:03 +1200
> >> From: Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com>
> >> Subject: [Crash-utility] [PATCH v1 1/3] ppc64: Fix bt printing error
> >> stack trace
> >> To: devel(a)lists.crash-utility.osci.io
> >> Cc: adityag(a)linux.ibm.com, Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com>
> >> Message-ID: <20240917234205.7783-2-ltao(a)redhat.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true
> >>
> >> A error stack trace of bt cmd observed:
> >>
> >> crash> bt 1
> >> PID: 1 TASK: c000000003714b80 CPU: 2 COMMAND:
"systemd"
> >> #0 [c0000000037735c0] _end at c0000000037154b0 (unreliable)
> >> #1 [c000000003773770] __switch_to at c00000000001fa9c
> >> #2 [c0000000037737d0] __schedule at c00000000112e4ec
> >> #3 [c0000000037738b0] schedule at c00000000112ea80
> >> ...
> >>
> >> The #0 stack trace is incorrect, the function address shouldn't exceed
_end.
> >> The reason is for kernel>=v6.2, the offset of pt_regs to sp changed from
> >> STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD, i.e 112, to STACK_SWITCH_FRAME_REGS. For
> >> CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1, it's 112, for ABI_V2, it's 48. So the nip
will read a
> >> wrong value from stack when ABI_V2 enabled.
> >>
> >
> > Can you help to add the related kernel commits to patch log? That will help me a
lot to review the patches.
> >
> Sure, will update it in v2.
>
> >>
> >> To determine if ABI_V2 enabled is tricky. This patch do it by check the
> >> following:
> >
> >
> > Can you try to read the value of e_flags from the elf header and to determine
what ABI version it is?
> >
> Do you mean by checking the following?
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c:fadump_init_elfcore_header():
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2))
> elf->e_flags = 2;
> else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1))
> elf->e_flags = 1;
> else
> elf->e_flags = 0;
>
> I think this only works for fadump, but it will not work for normal
Maybe "not". I did not try it, but I noticed that there is a similar checking
in kernel module, please refer to this one: arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
bool module_elf_check_arch(Elf_Ehdr *hdr)
{
unsigned long abi_level = hdr->e_flags & 0x3;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2))
return abi_level == 2;
else
return abi_level < 2;
}
> kdump. Also for kcore, the e_flags are set as:
>
> read_kcore_iter():
> #ifndef ELF_CORE_EFLAGS
> #define ELF_CORE_EFLAGS 0
> #endif
> .e_flags = ELF_CORE_EFLAGS,
>
> So it seems the e_flags is not a suitable approach for me...
The ELF_CORE_EFLAGS should be defined in the arch/powerpc/include/asm/elf.h:
#define ELF_CORE_EFLAGS (is_elf2_task() ? 2 : 0)
And also refer to this one(arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h):
#if defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
#define is_elf2_task() (test_thread_flag(TIF_ELF2ABI))
#else
#define is_elf2_task() (0)
#endif
Anyway, can you try it? Or have you already tried it?
Yes you are correct, the ELF_CORE_EFLAGS is not 0. But I tried the
code, checking is_elf2_task(), or test_thread_flag(...) is not as easy
as checking the header of vmlinux. Some processes with thread_flag
0x00, some seem correct, not sure why it occurs, so not a stable
approach to me. See the following:
crash> set -p
crash> task -x
PID: 1208 TASK: c0000000087f9800 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "bash"
struct task_struct {
thread_info = {
...
flags = 0x0
...
crash> set 1
crash> task -x
PID: 1 TASK: c000000003714b80 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "systemd"
struct task_struct {
thread_info = {
...
flags = 0x42000
...
I suggest using the vmlinux header check approach, see the comment in [1].
[1]:
https://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io/msg01167.html
Thanks,
Tao Liu
Lianbo
>
> Thanks,
> Tao Liu
>
>
> > Thanks
> > Lianbo
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> In arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc_asm.h:
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2
> >> #define STK_GOT 24
> >> #else
> >> #define STK_GOT 40
> >>
> >> In arch/powerpc/kernel/tm.S:
> >> _GLOBAL(tm_reclaim)
> >> mfcr r5
> >> mflr r0
> >> stw r5, 8(r1)
> >> std r0, 16(r1)
> >> std r2, STK_GOT(r1)
> >> ...
> >>
> >> So a disassemble on tm_reclaim, and extract the STK_GOT value from std
> >> instruction is used as the approach.
> >>
> >> After the patch:
> >> crash> bt 1
> >> PID: 1 TASK: c000000003714b80 CPU: 2 COMMAND:
"systemd"
> >> #0 [c0000000037737d0] __schedule at c00000000112e4ec
> >> #1 [c0000000037738b0] schedule at c00000000112ea80
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <ltao(a)redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> defs.h | 1 +
> >> ppc64.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
> >> index 2231cb6..d5cb8cc 100644
> >> --- a/defs.h
> >> +++ b/defs.h
> >> @@ -4643,6 +4643,7 @@ struct efi_memory_desc_t {
> >> #define MSR_PR_LG 14 /* Problem State / Privilege Level */
> >> /* Used to find the user or kernel-mode
frame*/
> >>
> >> +#define STACK_SWITCH_FRAME_REGS 48
> >> #define STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD 112
> >> #define EXCP_FRAME_MARKER 0x7265677368657265
> >>
> >> diff --git a/ppc64.c b/ppc64.c
> >> index e8930a1..6e5f155 100644
> >> --- a/ppc64.c
> >> +++ b/ppc64.c
> >> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static ulong pud_page_vaddr_l4(ulong pud);
> >> static ulong pmd_page_vaddr_l4(ulong pmd);
> >> static int is_opal_context(ulong sp, ulong nip);
> >> void opalmsg(void);
> >> +static bool is_ppc64_elf_abi_v2(void);
> >>
> >> static int is_opal_context(ulong sp, ulong nip)
> >> {
> >> @@ -2813,6 +2814,51 @@ ppc64_get_sp(ulong task)
> >> return sp;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static bool
> >> +is_ppc64_elf_abi_v2(void)
> >> +{
> >> + char buf1[BUFSIZE];
> >> + char *pos1, *pos2;
> >> + int errflag = 0;
> >> + ulong stk_got = 0;
> >> + static bool ret = false;
> >> + static bool checked = false;
> >> +
> >> + if (checked == true || !symbol_exists("tm_reclaim"))
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + sprintf(buf1, "x/16i tm_reclaim");
> >> + open_tmpfile();
> >> + if (!gdb_pass_through(buf1, pc->tmpfile, GNU_RETURN_ON_ERROR))
> >> + goto out;
> >> + checked = true;
> >> + rewind(pc->tmpfile);
> >> + while (fgets(buf1, BUFSIZE, pc->tmpfile)) {
> >> + // "std r2, STK_GOT(r1)" is expected
> >> + if (strstr(buf1, "std") &&
> >> + strstr(buf1, "(r1)") &&
> >> + (pos1 = strstr(buf1, "r2,"))) {
> >> + pos1 += strlen("r2,");
> >> + for (pos2 = pos1; *pos2 != '\0' &&
*pos2 != '('; pos2++);
> >> + *pos2 = '\0';
> >> + stk_got = stol(pos1, RETURN_ON_ERROR|QUIET,
&errflag);
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (!errflag) {
> >> + switch (stk_got) {
> >> + case 24:
> >> + ret = true;
> >> + case 40:
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + error(WARNING, "Unstable elf_abi v1/v2 detection.\n");
> >> +out:
> >> + close_tmpfile();
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * get the SP and PC values for idle tasks.
> >> @@ -2834,9 +2880,17 @@ get_ppc64_frame(struct bt_info *bt, ulong *getpc,
ulong *getsp)
> >> sp = ppc64_get_sp(task);
> >> if (!INSTACK(sp, bt))
> >> goto out;
> >> - readmem(sp+STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD, KVADDR, ®s,
> >> - sizeof(struct ppc64_pt_regs),
> >> - "PPC64 pt_regs", FAULT_ON_ERROR);
> >> +
> >> + if (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(6,2,0) &&
is_ppc64_elf_abi_v2()) {
> >> + readmem(sp+STACK_SWITCH_FRAME_REGS, KVADDR, ®s,
> >> + sizeof(struct ppc64_pt_regs),
> >> + "PPC64 pt_regs", FAULT_ON_ERROR);
> >> + } else {
> >> + readmem(sp+STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD, KVADDR, ®s,
> >> + sizeof(struct ppc64_pt_regs),
> >> + "PPC64 pt_regs", FAULT_ON_ERROR);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> ip = regs.nip;
> >> closest = closest_symbol(ip);
> >> if (STREQ(closest, ".__switch_to") || STREQ(closest,
"__switch_to")) {
> >> --
> >> 2.40.1
>