----- "Toshikazu Nakayama" <nakayama.ts(a)ncos.nec.co.jp> wrote:
Hello Dave,
>Hello Toshi,
>
>I made several changes to your last patch as we discussed before,
>and successfully tested it on the x86, x86_64, ia64, s390 and s390x
>architectures.
>
>I've attached the patch as it is queued for the next release.
>
>Because I was working against my own updated tree, the patch also
>contains a couple other symbol-handling related changes that are
>also queued for the next release.
>
>Thanks for getting the ball rolling for this feature,
> Dave
Because your patch could not apply to crash-5.0.9 with patch command,
I manually apply them and they can run well over my environs.
Hmmm -- works for me:
# tar xzf crash-5.0.9.tar.gz
# cd crash-5.0.9
# patch -p1 < $HOME/symbols.patch
patching file help.c
patching file kernel.c
patching file alpha.c
patching file ppc.c
patching file s390.c
patching file s390x.c
patching file ppc64.c
patching file x86_64.c
patching file symbols.c
patching file lkcd_x86_trace.c
patching file unwind.c
patching file defs.h
#
Maybe you were trying to apply them on top of your last patch?
Anyway, as long as you're happy with the end result...
I'll use crash-5.0.9 with your patch
until crash-5.0.10 got available.
I saw that you've updated whole places where per-cpu or MODULE_SYMBOL
should be applicable in crash utility.
Thanks again Toshi,
Dave