On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:37 AM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab(a)nec.com>
wrote:
 On 2023/08/18 3:08, David Mair wrote:
 > Hi All,
 >
 > Before I consider starting work on a patch for this I'd appreciate more
 > input.
 >
 > I am seeing random cases of crash failing to load reporting an x86_64
 > coredump reporting a "bad" linux_banner. However, the value displayed as
 > the banner is:
 >
 > 0x65762078756e694c
 >
 > which is plainly ASCII text as a 64-bit number and is the little-endian
 > reversal of the text "Linux ver".
 >
 > It's randomly found with specific coredumps and reproduces all times
 > with that coredump and a given version of crash, though sometimes it
 > will appear when using a given coredump with one version of crash but
 > not with another version of crash. What I'm trying to get working is
 > crash current and the rest of this is experience using crash 8.0.3 only.
 >
 > I used gdb crash to debug it through verify_version(). If I breakpoint
 > there with gdb crash and step through the function I find that in the
 > section:
 >
 >
 >      if (!(sp = symbol_search("linux_banner")))
 >          error(FATAL, "linux_banner symbol does not exist?\n");
 >      else if ((sp->type == 'R') || (sp->type == 'r') ||
 >          (THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(2,6,11) && (sp->type ==
'D' ||
 > sp->type == 'd')) ||
 >           (machine_type("ARM") && sp->type == 'T') ||
 >           (machine_type("ARM64")))
 >          linux_banner = symbol_value("linux_banner");
 >      else
 >          get_symbol_data("linux_banner", sizeof(ulong),
&linux_banner);
 >
 >
 > * The if block is not executed, i.e. symbol_search("linux_banner")
 > succeeded and we have a usable struct syment for "linux_banner" in sp
 > * The else if block is not executed, all conditions are met or not
 > relevant except for the the value of sp->type in the case of
 > THIS_KERNEL_VERSION >= LINUX(2,6,11). But sp->type is 'B', bss
segment
 > * The final else block is executed, we copy sizeof(ulong) bytes of
 > symbol data from what "linux_banner" refers to into the crash internal
 > linux_banner variable
 >
 > Here's how sp looks at the else if statement in the above code:
 >
 > gdb) print *sp
 > $2 = {value = 18446744071587233984, name = 0x5555566a735b "linux_banner",
 >    val_hash_next = 0x7fffe51e4338, name_hash_next = 0x7fffe51f8d38,
 >    type = 66 'B', cnt = 1 '\001', flags = 0 '\000', pad2 = 0
'\000'}
 >
 > ...and sp->value in hex is:
 >
 > (gdb) p/x sp->value
 > $5 = 0xffffffff818000c0
 >
 > Starting crash in --minimal mode with the same core, kernel and
 > debuginfo so that I can try to read 0xffffffff818000c0 I find:
 >
 > crash> rd 0xffffffff818000c0 18
 > ffffffff818000c0:  65762078756e694c 2e34206e6f697372   Linux version 4.
 > ffffffff818000d0:  34392d3038312e34 6665642d3533312e   4.180-94.135-def
 > ffffffff818000e0:  65672820746c7561 6c697562406f6b65   ault (geeko@buil
 > ffffffff818000f0:  28202974736f6864 7372657620636367   dhost) (gcc vers
 > ffffffff81800100:  2e382e34206e6f69 2045535553282035   ion 4.8.5 (SUSE
 > ffffffff81800110:  29202978756e694c 20504d5320312320   Linux) ) #1 SMP
 > ffffffff81800120:  20766f4e206e6f4d 35353a3930203631   Mon Nov 16 09:55
 > ffffffff81800130:  204354552037353a 3033282030323032   :57 UTC 2020 (30
 > ffffffff81800140:  000a293039393633 0000000000000000   36990)..........
 >
 > IOW, it is the linux_banner, it's at 0xffffffff818000c0 and if the first
 > sizeof(ulong) bytes are read into crash's linux_banner variable via
 > get_symbol_data() it makes a 64-bit number with little-endian revesral
 > from the string bytes "Linux ver" from the actual linux_banner text, the
 > same value seen in the error report when crash fails.
 >
 > If I repeat the above debug of verify_version() in gdb and at the else
 > if block in the above C in verify_version() I set var the sp->type to be
 > 'D' or 'd' then crash's linux_banner is set to
0xffffffff818000c0
 > (sp->value) and the else if block is executed then the remainder of the
 > function successfully finds a linux_banner and gets the version
 > information from it and crash loads.
 >
 > In symbol_search() is the value of type in the returned struct syment a
 > property generated by crash (I thought not and it was based on the
 > kernel compilation, possible kdummp/makedumpfile but not controlled by
 > crash)? If I'm correct then is it safe to expect a struct syment with
 > type 'B' (also 'b' I believe) for linux_banner? Or is there
anything
 > special about a bss segment type that makes it not possible to assume we
 > can take sp->value as-is for the address of the linux_banner string
 > details, i.e. we can't safely use symbol_value("linux_banner") to set
 > the crash linux_banner variable if the struct syment type for
 > linux_banner is 'B' or 'b'?
 >
 > Any comments? I'll write a patch if that's the right direction but I
 > need a better understanding of why symbols with the type bss segment
 > aren't already assumed valid sources of a linux_banner address value,
 > only 'D' and 'd' types are and if there is anything special I
don't
 > understand about 'B' and 'b' types.
 >
 
Thank you for pointing out this issue, David.
 It seems that sp->type is set to a value from
bfd_get_symbol_info() in
 store_symbols().  So it's from the vmlinux through the embedded gdb.
 Anyway, I don't think that the current check gets the point, i.e. we can
 check the type of the linux_banner symbol directly like this?
 
The following change looks better(Btw: if we don't consider the performance
of requesting gdb).
    switch (get_symbol_type("linux_banner", NULL, NULL))
    {
        case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
            linux_banner = sp->value;
            break;
        case TYPE_CODE_PTR:
            get_symbol_data("linux_banner", sizeof(ulong), &linux_banner);
            break;
        default:
            error(WARNING, "linux_banner is unknown type\n");
            linux_banner = 0;
            break;
    }
 I don't know why it checks the sp->type, but what it should do
 originally might be the above, I think.
 
Let me recall this a bit, it might follow the original change, and seems to
have no particular intentions.
Lianbo, do you have an old vmcore that has "const char *linux_banner"?
 According to crash commit fce91bec5bef, 2.6.10 and older kernels
have
 it.  I'd like to test the above with it.
 
Yes. I have several such vmcores.
crash> sym linux_banner
ffffffff803ea3c0 (D) linux_banner
crash> whatis linux_banner
const char *linux_banner;
Thanks.
Lianbo
 Thanks,
 Kazu