Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH] Use only tasks on online CPUs for bt -a
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
----- "Dave Anderson" <anderson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- "Michael Holzheu" <holzheu(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 10:29 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> > I'd prefer not to leave them out of the various internal task
arrays,
> > especially the active_set[] array. Regardless of their on/offline
> > status, they do still exist as tasks, have runqueues, etc.
>
> Ok, fine.
>
> > If you're just worried about "bt -a", then why not just catch
> > the offline status in the for loop inside "if (active)" section
> > of cmd_bt()?
>
> Good idea! The following attached patch also works for me.
>
> Michael
That looks good -- queued for the next release.
Thanks,
Dave
Sorry -- I take it back. Running a test shows that it breaks "bt -a"
on Xen dumpfiles where the cpus are marked offline prior to dumping
the kernel memory.
I think this should be moved to the processor-specific backtrace functions,
which can just display "OFFLINE" or something to that effect.
Dave
> ---
> kernel.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel.c
> +++ b/kernel.c
> @@ -1989,6 +1989,8 @@ cmd_bt(void)
> free_all_bufs();
> continue;
> }
> + if (!(kt->cpu_flags[c] & ONLINE))
> + continue;
> if ((tc = task_to_context(tt->panic_threads[c]))) {
> pc->flags |= IN_FOREACH;
> DO_TASK_BACKTRACE();
Monday, 26 April
Mon, 26 Apr
12:28 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH] Use only tasks on online CPUs for bt -a
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 11:56 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
Sorry -- I take it back. Running a test shows that it breaks
"bt -a"
on Xen dumpfiles where the cpus are marked offline prior to dumping
the kernel memory.
I think this should be moved to the processor-specific backtrace functions,
which can just display "OFFLINE" or something to that effect.
Ok, fine. What about the following...
---
s390.c | 5 +++++
s390x.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
--- a/s390.c
+++ b/s390.c
@@ -603,11 +603,16 @@ s390_back_trace_cmd(struct bt_info *bt)
unsigned long async_start = 0, async_end = 0;
unsigned long panic_start = 0, panic_end = 0;
unsigned long stack_end, stack_start, stack_base;
+ int cpu = bt->tc->processor;
if (bt->hp && bt->hp->eip) {
error(WARNING,
"instruction pointer argument ignored on this architecture!\n");
}
+ if (is_task_active(bt->task) && (!(kt->cpu_flags[cpu] & ONLINE))) {
+ fprintf(fp, " CPU offline\n");
+ return;
+ }
ksp = bt->stkptr;
/* print lowcore and get async stack when task has cpu */
--- a/s390x.c
+++ b/s390x.c
@@ -836,11 +836,16 @@ s390x_back_trace_cmd(struct bt_info *bt)
unsigned long panic_start = 0, panic_end = 0;
unsigned long stack_end, stack_start, stack_base;
unsigned long r14;
+ int cpu = bt->tc->processor;
if (bt->hp && bt->hp->eip) {
error(WARNING,
"instruction pointer argument ignored on this architecture!\n");
}
+ if (is_task_active(bt->task) && (!(kt->cpu_flags[cpu] & ONLINE))) {
+ fprintf(fp, " CPU offline\n");
+ return;
+ }
ksp = bt->stkptr;
/* print lowcore and get async stack when task has cpu */
5327
days inactive
5327
days old
devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Dave Anderson -
Michael Holzheu