Hi Tao & Kazu,
On 21/03/24 14:30, Tao Liu wrote:
Thanks for the comments.
Yes, I guess if we all agree that 1 thread gdb is better, then I and
Aditya can work together to clean up the code, e.g. rearrange the
powerpc series and mine. I agree the code which gets added and then
removed should be cleaned up in later patchsets.
Let's rebase our patch series then.
As of now it's a lot of dependent patches here and there. I think maybe
your "Leave only one thread for gdb" commit should go first. It
simplifies the implementation.
And, with it being 1 gdb thread, and all of us using 'CURRENT_CONTEXT',
I guess it makes sense to rename 'machdep->get_cpu_reg' to
'machdep->get_current_reg'.
Any comments ?
- Aditya Gupta
> I think you're going to do this later though, just in case.
Thanks,
Tao Liu
> [
1]https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki#writing-patches
>
> Thanks,
> Kazu
--
Crash-utility mailing list --devel(a)lists.crash-utility.osci.io
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-leave(a)lists.crash-utility.osci.io
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution
Guidelines:https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki