Re: [Crash-utility] [RFC][PATCH]: crash aborts with cannot determine idle task

----- "Dave Anderson" <anderson(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Sorry -- that's not what I meant... What I want to avoid is screwing around with the prstatus notes bookkeeping unless it is absolutely necessary, i.e., where there had been some cpus offlined prior to the crash. The original thread back in April 2008 mentioned something to the effect that your test system only had cpus 12 and 13 online at the time of the crash. When that is the case, is kt->cpus equal to 14? I.e., what does the "sys" command show for "CPUS:"? I ask because this is the way I'd prefer to go: void map_cpus_to_prstatus(void) { void **nt_ptr; int online, i, j, nrcpus; size_t size; if (!(online = get_cpus_online()) || (online == kt->cpus)) return; if (CRASHDEBUG(1)) error(INFO, "cpus: %d online: %d NT_PRSTATUS notes: %d (remapping)\n", kt->cpus, online, nd->num_prstatus_notes); size = NR_CPUS * sizeof(void *); nt_ptr = (void **)GETBUF(size); BCOPY(nd->nt_prstatus_percpu, nt_ptr, size); BZERO(nd->nt_prstatus_percpu, size); /* * Re-populate the array with the notes mapping to online cpus */ nrcpus = (kt->kernel_NR_CPUS ? kt->kernel_NR_CPUS : NR_CPUS); for (i = 0, j = 0; i < nrcpus; i++) { if (in_cpu_map(ONLINE, i)) nd->nt_prstatus_percpu[i] = nt_ptr[j++]; } FREEBUF(nt_ptr); } And since kt->cpus may not be finally initialized until later than kernel_init(), I moved the call to map_cpus_to_prstatus() to here in task_init(): if (ACTIVE()) { active_pid = REMOTE() ? pc->server_pid : pc->program_pid; set_context(NO_TASK, active_pid); tt->this_task = pid_to_task(active_pid); } else { if (KDUMP_DUMPFILE()) map_cpus_to_prstatus(); please_wait("determining panic task"); set_context(get_panic_context(), NO_PID); please_wait_done(); } Can you test the map_cpus_to_prstatus() function above, along with the movement of the call to it from kernel_init() to task_init()? Thanks, Dave