8:04 a.m.
----- "Wei Jiang" <talk90091e(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
In my test, I did not see any exceptions else due to my 32bits dump
file is corrupted. As you know, a incorrect nr_cpus will
lead to some following fields(dha_smp_current_task, dha_stack) are
pointed to a error location, which might be a potential defect and
will be raised in future.
Actually I don't know -- so that's why I asked. I almost never see
an LKCD dumpfile.
Anyway, the fix is queued for the next release.
Thanks,
Dave
6:40 a.m.
New subject: nr_cpus is not calculated properly
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 09:04 -0400 schrieb Dave Anderson:
----- "Wei Jiang" <talk90091e(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> In my test, I did not see any exceptions else due to my 32bits dump
> file is corrupted. As you know, a incorrect nr_cpus will
> lead to some following fields(dha_smp_current_task, dha_stack) are
> pointed to a error location, which might be a potential defect and
> will be raised in future.
Actually I don't know -- so that's why I asked. I almost never see
an LKCD dumpfile.
Just FYI: For s390 we still use the lkcd dump format in some cases.
Therefore we still need the support in crash.
Michael
7:36 a.m.
New subject: nr_cpus is not calculated properly
----- "Michael Holzheu" <holzheu(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 09:04 -0400 schrieb Dave Anderson:
> ----- "Wei Jiang" <talk90091e(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > In my test, I did not see any exceptions else due to my 32bits dump
> > file is corrupted. As you know, a incorrect nr_cpus will
> > lead to some following fields(dha_smp_current_task, dha_stack) are
> > pointed to a error location, which might be a potential defect and
> > will be raised in future.
>
> Actually I don't know -- so that's why I asked. I almost never see
> an LKCD dumpfile.
>
Just FYI: For s390 we still use the lkcd dump format in some cases.
Therefore we still need the support in crash.
No problem -- I understand. I didn't mean to imply that LKCD support was
being dropped. But I am operating in the blind here, and I just wanted
as much information about what the end result of the i386 header inconsistency
was. And I still prefer not to tinker with the LKCD files unless I get a
sign-off from folks like yourself who still use it.
Thanks,
Dave
11:14 a.m.
New subject: nr_cpus is not calculated properly
Michael Holzheu schrieb:
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 09:04 -0400 schrieb Dave Anderson:
> ----- "Wei Jiang" <talk90091e(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In my test, I did not see any exceptions else due to my 32bits dump
>> file is corrupted. As you know, a incorrect nr_cpus will
>> lead to some following fields(dha_smp_current_task, dha_stack) are
>> pointed to a error location, which might be a potential defect and
>> will be raised in future.
> Actually I don't know -- so that's why I asked. I almost never see
> an LKCD dumpfile.
>
Just FYI: For s390 we still use the lkcd dump format in some cases.
Therefore we still need the support in crash.
That change that broke i386 affected i386, x86_64 and ia64 only. I made
it for ia64 that time.
Regards,
Bernhard
5493
days inactive
5496
days old
devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bernhard Walle -
Dave Anderson -
Michael Holzheu